Search engines no ip stored

Navigation menu
  1. "3 Secure and Safe Search Engines You Need to Know About"
  2. We don't collect or share personal information.
  3. 10 Lesser Known Search Engines that are not popular, but are Rich in Features!

We could have had an actual privacy-based search engine with no dependency on the tech giants and no censorship since StartPage doesn't seem to believe in it, unlike Qwant. But with the situation as is, I cannot recommend StartPage at all due to the censored results and sharing your system data with Google. Use only for emergencies when you really need Google's huge web index. StartPage just literally got bought by an advertising company and also ran a Mozilla-esque PR piece defending the acquisition.

To be honest, I've always felt something was off about these guys; their image was "too clean" if you know what I mean. Now we have proof that for them, privacy has only served as a useful slogan; they never actually gave a shit about it. Therefore, I can honestly advise to avoid these frauds completely now! An interesting new search engine dedicated to lean, personal, old-school websites. Really recommend keeping an eye on that one - and you can literally support the creation of a better Internet by submitting websites to it if you know a good one, you should really do that.

No big corpos allowed here! Does not require JavaScript actually, there is not a single script on its page. Keeps logs for 48 hours archive , though. The search engine that doesn't track you! Or at least, that is what it claims. The marketing is slick and I must admit I fell for it initially and was a fan for a long time - but to be honest, there were always red flags.

Private Search Engines - Go Incognito 3.6

DuckDuckGo hosts a a privacy site archive with some great guides. They've refuted archive myths archive and went after giants like Google archive - always a plus in my mind and a huge reason to consider a provider trustworthy. Their Twitter account posts privacy stuff all the time, etc. At a glance, DDG appears as just a group of people like you and me, looking to protect their privacy and creating a service to do so unlike Mozilla's in-your-face manipulation. Unfortunately, like the great magicians they are, they've made a really convincing illusion - but still an illusion; and I will show just how.

As I said, the red flags were always there.

Gabriel Weinberg - the DuckDuckGo founder - used to run the the Names Database , a social network allowing you to reconnect with old friends from school. However, the most important feature - sending messages - was locked behind a paywall which could be bypassed if you invited 24 people to the network. They claimed that you could remove yourself from the database if you wanted to:.

However, the service did not really respect the user :. Just by visiting the website you've accepted all its terms what if they've included a line "we can kill you in your sleep" while you weren't looking?

Site Index

So everything you submitted there ceased to become yours or even if someone else posted your personal info , and could have been transferred to any other company. Later versions of the agreement contained even more egregious stuff such as:. So I can't change my user agent; use wget, httrack or curl; or even take a screenshot of the site.

Funny shit. And this is all stuff that the later DDG founder agreed to. Then he sold the database to another company, Classmates. So the privacy guru that later founded DuckDuckGo sold all your data to an even more unethical company archive. Did he have a sudden change of heart and created the uber-privacy-respecting DDG? Let's check it out:. DuckDuckGo used to claim in its privacy policy that no cookies are used by default, but some years ago it turned out they were setting a cookie from a third party , contrary to their policy.

It was only on their help page and they fixed it quite fast. So is that all I've got? A cookie from ages ago? In their Privacy Policy archive they proudly proclaim, in big letters, that they don't collect or share personal information. The big question here, of course, is what is meant by personal information.

It turns out that, for DuckDuckGo at least, search queries alone are not personal - even if you search for something only you could know. I'm pretty sure most people would disagree with that. DuckDuckGo claims that it is fine if you don't store the user agent or IP address along with the search, though:.

"3 Secure and Safe Search Engines You Need to Know About"

What this non-personal search data consists of, is of course not stated. Is it really only the search queries DDG saves? We do know that, for example, DuckDuckGo tracks Pale Moon usage through a parameter in the search query? This also likely happens for their other partners archive. Is that not already personal? Could it not be used to link your searches? The funny thing is, DuckDuckGo has spent much of their privacy policy criticizing Amazon for leaking their search queries , which were able to be linked to single users because they fucked up their anonymization.

Can you ensure this also couldn't be done for DuckDuckGo's saved searches? After all they do track other information as I've showed earlier. As DDG itself says archive , The only truly anonymized data is no data - so why not just not store the search queries? From the techcrunch article:. How long does DDG store the search queries? That is not explained! They do admit they will comply with court ordered legal requests.

What could law enforcement do if they came across queries that only I could have searched for? Could those be used against me? No idea but I'd much rather not have that happen! Then, DuckDuckGo admits to running experiments on their users :. That's quite a lot of information, and right after criticizing so-called anonymous data collection!

This is exactly what I've criticized Mozilla for doing and in fact what prompted me to rewrite this whole section and article.

  • The Best Search Engines for Privacy.
  • Google, Yahoo, and Bing dominate the market share.
  • sex offenders in columbia county ga.
  • indiana marriage license dearborn county.
  • phone book listing for an area.
  • How to Browse the Web Anonymously - Techlicious.
  • What are the new features of the iPhone 11, iPhone 11 Pro, and iPhone 11 Pro Max?.

Gabriel Weinberg has shown himself to be hypocritical and broke trust on many occassions. For a recent one, he has put his shirt selling service behind Cloudflare a MITM without notifying the buyer in any way. So what's the final verdict on DDG? Looking only at the surface, you could still put it in high tier - there's no IP storage nor most of the other data search providers usually collect.

Third party requests are not made. There is a JS-free version and they do host a Tor hidden service. For the non-privacy relevant stuff: the search results are really fucking good; Bing and Yahoo are used for them, as well as their own crawler. More than that - DDG displays "instant answers" from over than different sources in the top right corner of the window.

We don't collect or share personal information.

Has ads that can be disabled in the settings. In addition to regular sites, DDG can search for images, videos YouTube results only as well as news. However, digging deeper shows several serious issues with the founder's lack of reliability and trustworthiness. He clearly does not truly care about you or your privacy - as the recent Cloudflare inclusion shows. Being the great businessman that he is, he has pretended very effectively that he does and took great advantage of the recent privacy scares.

You could say it's the Tutanota of search engines - good enough as an entry point, but you can do better. There is nothing out there even approaching the level of RiseUp's email service, though; so DuckDuckGo remains a viable option for regular usage still.

A French engine that claims to be fully private :. If we carefully analyze this vague on purpose? After all - if they did not store them - what exactly is being dissociated from my IP address? And if they don't store the IP, the queries would have nothing to be dissociated from. Of course, the other interpretation is that they don't actually store any of that. Assuming these are French people, there is a possible language barrier here. But they didn't - why didn't the French data controller advise them of this if they do not in fact do it?

  • Why is my IP address not safe while using Incognito mode?.
  • 1. Use DuckDuckGo to search;
  • Search engine privacy - Wikipedia;
  • how can i find someones home address;
  • how to find cell phone band.
  • Search Engines - which one to choose?.

They admit they have not fully indexed the Internet yet, so you will get results from Bing to complement Qwant's own. But we should expect Qwant to eventually finish the job The shift towards total independence is therefore progressive, and this is indeed the direction taken by Qwant, difficult to see from the outside! Speaking of censorship, Qwant claims to be unbiased :. And from their philosophy page :. However, contrary to the above, they have inexplicably signed a censorship agreement archive. Not only that, they allow reporting of content :.

And - even though I could not detect any censorship through my tests - they do confirm that they the removal of certain results is possible:. So, we should consider this a censorship-friendly engine.

10 Lesser Known Search Engines that are not popular, but are Rich in Features!

What are some other peculiarities of Qwant? It can search for images, news, videos YouTube only , shopping no results? JavaScript version is slow and breaks Pale Moon sometimes, but there is a JS-free one available as well though that one will lack the handy Instant Answers. Has a privacy-respecting Maps functionality!